I would recommend 0x0a -> University be reclassified as "place of education" that will cover the land area and leave building in the plot as 0x13. That will cut down too many subclassifications ie schools, collages, university and then private ...
I also do the same for rural polyclinics and medical facilities land area as 0x0b.
That I find easy for remembering by colours instead of trying to remember what the various colours refer to.
The only issue that will arise for all this consolidation is should we need in the future to have a detail breakdown - then it will need sorting out now, but can still be resolved by using the same colour only different polygon no asignment. That you can see now used in the default rivers and lakes polygons.
My 2 cts worth.
MFM Polygon Standardization Discussion
Moderators: tympg, Moderators, Regional Mappers
-
- Regional Mapper (retired)
- Posts: 752
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 2:37 am
- Location: Shah Alam (GMXT+i-Blue747 Logger, Holux GPSmile62 Pro)
Re: MFM Polygon Standardization Discussion
1. Currently using 0x05 car park for badminton/basketball/etc court. Anyone using others skin? Quit worried later on need to do lots of editing if we all use different skin.
2. Some of the housing area already there physically but google map haven't updated yet, for this type of area, currently I plot the whole area with house skin. Acceptable?
2. Some of the housing area already there physically but google map haven't updated yet, for this type of area, currently I plot the whole area with house skin. Acceptable?
Re: MFM Polygon Standardization Discussion
edchuang wrote:1. Currently using 0x05 car park for badminton/basketball/etc court. Anyone using others skin? Quit worried later on need to do lots of editing if we all use different skin.
2. Some of the housing area already there physically but google map haven't updated yet, for this type of area, currently I plot the whole area with house skin. Acceptable?
1. i'm also used 0x05 ...
2. i think can accept loh.. because i'm draw the polygon at 'Kampung Area' also using this method.
-
- Regional Mapper (retired)
- Posts: 752
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 2:37 am
- Location: Shah Alam (GMXT+i-Blue747 Logger, Holux GPSmile62 Pro)
Re: MFM Polygon Standardization Discussion
chrisean wrote:1. i'm also used 0x05 ...
2. i think can accept loh.. because i'm draw the polygon at 'Kampung Area' also using this method.
Great to know that our way of choosing polygon type is inline. So less worried for me now. Thanks Bro.
Re: MFM Polygon Standardization Discussion
Please use rural housing area (0x3) for villages. I am using parking lot (0x5) for...car parks.
Garmin nüvi 2575R; Garmin eTrex Vista HCx; Android 5.0.1 Phone
- WeiQi00
- Polygon Mapper
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:44 am
- Location: Johor Bahru [60CSx + Nuvi 200w]
Re: MFM Polygon Standardization Discussion
tympg wrote:Please use rural housing area (0x3) for villages. I am using parking lot (0x5) for...car parks.
Note. Thanks
Our maps are FREE but we need funds to keep this site going. Please support our HOSTING FUND
Thanks for your support.
Thanks for your support.
-
- Regional Mapper (retired)
- Posts: 752
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 2:37 am
- Location: Shah Alam (GMXT+i-Blue747 Logger, Holux GPSmile62 Pro)
Re: MFM Polygon Standardization Discussion
tympg wrote:Please use rural housing area (0x3) for villages. I am using parking lot (0x5) for...car parks.
Well noted, so for the whole villages we use 0x0003 rural housing area and individual house inside the area we use 0x0010 right? Thanks.
- WeiQi00
- Polygon Mapper
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:44 am
- Location: Johor Bahru [60CSx + Nuvi 200w]
Re: MFM Polygon Standardization Discussion
edchuang wrote:tympg wrote:Please use rural housing area (0x3) for villages. I am using parking lot (0x5) for...car parks.
Well noted, so for the whole villages we use 0x0003 rural housing area and individual house inside the area we use 0x0010 right? Thanks.
I also think so. 0x03 for housing area, 0x10 for house. Thanks bro.
Our maps are FREE but we need funds to keep this site going. Please support our HOSTING FUND
Thanks for your support.
Thanks for your support.
Re: MFM Polygon Standardization Discussion
Any latest (updated) Polygon Reference Table?
TQ
TQ
- WeiQi00
- Polygon Mapper
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:44 am
- Location: Johor Bahru [60CSx + Nuvi 200w]
Re: MFM Polygon Standardization Discussion
sulphur wrote:Any latest (updated) Polygon Reference Table?
TQ
Hi bro sulphur, Good morning
Latest Polygon reference table you can refer to MFM Mapping Reference v2.2
can get the excel file from here viewtopic.php?f=4&t=284
Our maps are FREE but we need funds to keep this site going. Please support our HOSTING FUND
Thanks for your support.
Thanks for your support.
Return to “Mapping Guideline & Standards Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests