Singapore - Feedback (Q1 2010)

Moderators: Chuah, Moderators, Regional Mappers

User avatar
Pel
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:54 pm
Location: Singapore

Re: Singapore - Feedback (Q1 2010)

Postby Pel » Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:11 pm

MFM-Garmin-101213

Please refer to attached diagram. Some routing errors, as follows:
airport_rd_junction.jpg

A to J – Not possible to make U-turn at junction (Correct route: Go straight to E and make U-turn at next traffic light junction***.

D to C – Not possible to make U-turn at junction (Correct route: Make right turn to J, U-turn at next junction back to A, then make left turn)

F to C – Not possible to make right turn at junction (Correct route: Go straight to J, make U-turn at next junction back to A, then make left turn)

G to C – As per above

I to E – Should be able to turn right at junction directly (current route is wrong)

Thanks!


*** Note: This traffic light junction further up is currently not on the map – there should be a right turn to Paya Lebar Air Base ( viewtopic.php?f=19&t=6287&start=91 ).
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
Pel
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:54 pm
Location: Singapore

Re: Singapore - Feedback (Q1 2010)

Postby Pel » Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:43 pm

MFM-Garmin-101213

(1) Hougang Avenue 3 (west bound) - there is a right turn into Defu Lane 12

(2) Hougang Avenue 3 (east bound) - there is a U-turn just before Defu Lane 12

(3) Kim Chuan Road to Defu Lane 11 - the direct link has been removed (because of Bartley Road East). Correct route is to turn to Bartley Road East, make a U-turn slightly further up, then turn left to Defu Lane 11.

Thanks!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

epi
Valued Contributor
Posts: 1872
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:13 pm
Location: Singapore

Re: Singapore - Feedback (Q1 2010)

Postby epi » Tue Dec 14, 2010 5:18 pm

V.101213,
Tampines St 31 & Simei Rd are 2-line road.
Thanks.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

epi
Valued Contributor
Posts: 1872
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:13 pm
Location: Singapore

Re: Singapore - Feedback (Q1 2010)

Postby epi » Tue Dec 14, 2010 5:36 pm

V.101213,
Semei St 3 is a 2-line street.
Thyanks.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

epi
Valued Contributor
Posts: 1872
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:13 pm
Location: Singapore

Re: Singapore - Feedback (Q1 2010)

Postby epi » Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:07 pm

V.101213,
Bedok North Avenue 4 is a 2-line traffic flow road.
Thanks.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

epi
Valued Contributor
Posts: 1872
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:13 pm
Location: Singapore

Re: Singapore - Feedback (Q1 2010)

Postby epi » Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:31 pm

V.101213,
Tampines Ave 9 is a 2-line traffic flow road.
Thanks.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

epi
Valued Contributor
Posts: 1872
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:13 pm
Location: Singapore

Re: Singapore - Feedback (Q1 2010)

Postby epi » Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:50 pm

V.101213,
Tampines Ave 2 ia a 2-line road.
Thanks.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

epi
Valued Contributor
Posts: 1872
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:13 pm
Location: Singapore

Re: Singapore - Feedback (Q1 2010)

Postby epi » Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:05 pm

V.101213,
A partial 2-line road of Tampines Link.
Thanks.

Done! 209 - OngCC
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

yoladu
Valued Contributor
Posts: 392
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:14 pm

Re: Singapore - Feedback (Q1 2010)

Postby yoladu » Thu Dec 16, 2010 9:22 pm

mfm 101213

Some suggestions.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Contribute exclusively to MFM. MSM don't get it !

epi
Valued Contributor
Posts: 1872
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:13 pm
Location: Singapore

Re: Singapore - Feedback (Q1 2010)

Postby epi » Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:12 am

yoladu wrote:mfm 101213

Some suggestions.

The Nex print has just been put up in this week release. It was contributed by one of our brother here. I have just followed up by putting the Nex car park in place.
The Nex car park is extremely congestive during this period of time. As suggested by our brother, local news paper etc.. It is therefore advisable to park your cars elsewhere where to avoid to be stuck in a long queue jam if you you intend to go to Nex by car.
I have been there few time in the last 2 weeks. I hereby confirmed it is true.
The 2 Nex XXXX car park were purposely named after Nex. It is meant to be user friendly by instant searching alternative available inclusive of Nex instead of looking to the actual Blk xxxx. It is also hard for us to remember the meaning of Blk xxxx each time and every time.. but the Nex alternative poi. etc..
The 2 Nex XXXX car park are the most nearby public car park location next to the Nex to the members of public.
Please do not suggest to delete somethings which are meaningful and benefit to the users in this case.
Please suggest to delete somethings extra nothing but extra obviously.
Thanks.


Return to “SG Archives”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests