exz8 wrote:u just compared with holux...
how about papago comparision with nuvi log?
which less or more sensitive and accurate?
Papago and Holux is using the same software X2/X3
Moderators: Moderators, Regional Mappers
exz8 wrote:u just compared with holux...
how about papago comparision with nuvi log?
which less or more sensitive and accurate?
badrol wrote:antyong wrote:Attached is the comparison. It seems Holux is less sensitive.
Woh bro, your Nuvi can really "fly" ahh?
exz8 wrote:u just compared with holux...
how about papago comparision with nuvi log?
which less or more sensitive and accurate?
zamad wrote:The 'displayed' table shows points from Seafield Toll (got to get a reference point, right?), and the GDB file is attached for anyone who cares to analyse the tracks.
zamad wrote:I did a run from Puchong to Shah Alam this afternoon and logged the track using (1) Qstarz Q1000P datalogger, (2) Garmin nuvi 205W (patched) and (3) Papago R5800. The tracks run through open space and not between high rise buildings. Maybe, I'll do another one in KL later this week.
qcpang wrote:could anybody tell me how to get bin2gpx.exe? Thx.
Ivan
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests